🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of countries are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' youth". Legislation may be passed next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban could be "a potential measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to pass a proposal raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a useful foundation," commented a leading MEP driving the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. However, the administration vowed to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who died after viewing harmful social media material argues that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to design products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, regulation is primarily happening at the state level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws mandating guardian approval for teenagers to create social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various figures to mimic the Australian lead, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Apart from these regions, other countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies adopt a more measured position. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The body points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve user protection.

While this worldwide conversation continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries show that policymakers globally are increasingly willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.