🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart nuclear discussions with the United States as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations produced results, and shared new appeals had originated from go-betweens to restart discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet permit the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Walking a Challenging Route

Araghchi is walking a complex path since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more resilient defensively and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the US president asserting the locations had been destroyed. Subsequently, European countries used their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with US participation could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the talks that American atomic experts could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Officials claimed three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Current Status

Iranian officials stated the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in various formats if talks reopen.

Trump recently said he had been getting signals that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting consistent overtures from America either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a dominant force that abuses the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict showed the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He said the assaults began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently attempted to dictate their desires during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and continues the final solution to settle disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be followed."

"In case they address to the citizens of Tehran with the language of respect and respect, they will receive a reply in the same approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the struggle of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to destroy. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the country in the face of this assault."