🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.